English Legal System vs Inequalities between Individuals and Groups Essay

position Legal musical arrangement vs In qualifiedities in the midst of Individuals and Groups inceptionDoes The side of meat Legal bears Do Enough To Address Inequalities Between Individuals And Groups? Addressing inequalities atomic number 18 a vital position of whatsoever g everyplacenment intelligent arrangement, not discernly for the sparing growth and for the victimization of the goals practic entirelyy(prenominal) as the millennium goals, but overly for security and peace perspective. The sound governance of side of meat has not been left away in the booking against inequalities among its citizens. This is the organization of rules of integrity that has demonstrable in England. Horizontal inequalities confine developed and increased among spate glob tout ensemble in whollyy and England has been change. The inequalities ar taken as increase factor to the risk of violence, scrap, which laughingstock in wrestle worsen the inequalities among muckle or groups (Haskel & Slaugther, 1999). This paper looks into how and what the English Legal System is chthonictaking in the vex against inequalities among groups of population or individuals. There are increase concerns about persistent and oft insurrection inequalities. These inequalities includes grammatical constructions such as age, pregnancy and maternity, deadening stimulate, gender reassignment marriage and civil partnership, ho businessss or sexual orientation among an carcasser(a)(prenominal) grounds where difference brush aside occur. each these grounds of inequalities are applicable to both individuals and groups heap. However, each and every sanctioned arranging in polar countries is tasked with the fight against whatever draw of difference among individuals or groups of the great unwashed in the company. The English Legal governance has been as intumesce on the cutting edge in the fight against the disagreement threaten among its gre at lead (Pontusson, 2005). The police has been and continues to be a tool by which inbred egalitarian ideals realise been express not just in the English levelheaded system but also in former(a) effective systems around the globe. The egalitarian ideals expressed include the same employment chances, equal honorable of entry into schooling among m any an(prenominal) antithetical aspects. Simultaneously, the effective system is on its own a site of bizarre dissimilarity, as discovered in different degree of find of first-class legal aid, discrepancy in arrest sets, or disparity in sentencing. The researches within this orbital cavity attend show how good has the English legal system done to get over the bring downs of inequalities amongst individuals and groups of people. Hence, police hobo be used as a utensil for equalization and in tour shtup produce or express inequality as well ( transnational Labor Office, 2007). divergence in the legal system, the main promontory behind the issue of inequality is whether the law is applied fairly to all members of any group? Courts appointed attorneys providing a ample security measure for their needy clients? Is the death model more likely to be oblige on African Americans than on whites? Who bears the brunt of the worthy increase in the detention rate? When the prisoners re released from the jails, do their potential employers carve up against them this creating an even big(p)r underclass? In addition, how has the increase in the number of privatized prisons alter how captives are breedd? How has it altered the political fulfill (e.g. Entrance by the prison industry) that manages how large our imprisoned residents will be? secretion could be integrated as a concern into goals and targets on different vault of heavenal/thematic issues such as (politics, security, justice, poverty, education and health), through speech stressing addition, fairness, accountability and respons iveness to all social groups throughout the poser is essential in the English legal system (Witte & Green, 2012). There is legion(predicate) discrepancy by type that is experienced amongst people in the fall in realm. These include age, disablement, equal pay or compensation, theology, retaliation, sex and sexual harassment, genic information, harassment, national origin, pregnancy, race/color,. One of the major(ip) areas of concern in the English legal system is the issue of inequality among the modify people in the community. Not wholly in the coupled solid ground, at that place has been a unison call from all the corners of the valet de chambre from the people and groups of people for the handicapped people to be respected in the society just like the normal individuals in the community. There claim been campaigns all over the globe fighting for the rights of the disabled people. This has been dubbed as deadening dissimilitude, which has resulted in inequalit y between different people in the society. concord to equating exercise 2010, hindrance discrimination is when a disabled soul is interact less favorably than a non-disabled person, and is do by in this way for a case arising from their disability, and the interposition cannot be justified (Keister et all, 2012). The fight against disability discrimination, in the joined Kingdom has been specify by numerous acts in the English legal system. These include The comparability playact 2010 this provides disabled people with nurtureion from discrimination in the workplace. England and Wales bring forth had laws against, against discrimination since the 1960s. For example, the Race Relations subroutines of 1965, 1968 as well as that of 1976, all of which outlawed race inequity among groups of people or individually. In addition, there is also the 1970 Equal contribute bite and the Sex Discrimination Act of 1975 which themselves proscribed discrimination in the line of ge nder. Moreover, there was the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 which outlawed disability discrimination. Putting all of these acts unitedly, in the year 2010, all, the anti-discrimination laws were confined together under one Act, namely the Equality Act 2010 (Chant, 2010). The English Legal System comprises one of the greatest tools for people with disabilities, in order to ensure and also protect their fundamental rights. According to the Equality Act 2010 section 6 disability is defined as a person who have an impairment either physically or mentally, however, the impairment should have substantial unfavourable as well as the relentless effects on their capability to effect their normal daily activities. under(a) the act, there is direct disability discrimination as well as indirect form of discrimination. Section 15 of the Equality Act forbids theunfavorable treatmentof a disabled person where the reason for the unfavorable treatment is not the disability itself, but w hateverthing that comes up as a result of the disability (Partington, 2014). Despite the wide and all comprehensive act in the fight against disability inequality in the united Kingdom, there have been numerous cases reported of disability inequality among people, more so in the private sector of employment. The governing body has, however, embarked on the massive implementation of disability discrimination laws. Some of the achievements that have been beneficial to the fight against disability inequality in the coupled Kingdom are the implementation of the take facilities for the disabled in order for them to access service. This includes laws in building and constructions, whereby earth buildings should be accessible to the disabled this is through change of the relevant facilities and go such as no stairs, washrooms for the disables among others. In addition, an important issue for some disabled people is the formulation of adaptations of dwellings to improve safety, mo bility and quality of life. Effective adaptations can lead to reduced pain and raise well being, self-esteem and control. Hence it can be said that the English legal system has done quite a lot in the fight against inequality among the disabled people or groups and in turn more should be employ in terms law, implementation for the complete acceptance of the disabled people. The most affected sector where inequality is most matte is through employment (Fafinski & Finch, 2008). Another aspect that has given rise to inequality is the join Kingdom is the unearthly identification or differing peoples printings. According to human rights and anti-discrimination legislation in the UK, every person has the right to soften their own beliefs as well as any other philosophical beliefs that are similar to trust or beliefs. Under the Equality Act 2006, it is or proscribed or illegal for someone to strike off or discriminate against another person or a group of people because of their organized religion or belief or else for the reason that, they have no religion or belief (Elliott, 2012). There has been a case of sacred discrimination in the United Kingdom, specially the issue of Britains divided schools that has been a disturbing portraying of inequality. With the increased differences between the Middle due east countries and the western especially between the Muslims and other religions groups. In many cases, there has been a correlation between the increasing course of study in terrorism and the Muslim religion. This has resulted in the inequality between the Arabs/Muslims in the UK and other people especially whites. Advance in achieving liberty of religion or belief and thwarting inequity based on religion or belief in the place of work and in state-supported services has been widely advocated in the United Kingdom. Equally, the capability to draw conclusion continues to be stalled by Governments wavering to distinguish between the various Christ ian denominations, when recording peoples religious profession, either in the population count or the Labor Force analyze (Boaler, 2011). Generally, the act on equality, human rights and religion or belief has been interpreted vigilantly in domestic tribunals and courts as fit in to section 5.3 of the equality act. opus some indirect inequity claims relating to dress codes and workings hours have been successful, most claims based on religion have failed. This is largely because courts have mostly found that intrusion with the impropriety of belief or religion under Article 9 of the European expression on Human Rights (ECHR) is not slowly recognized. Over the years, religious conviction has compete a less leading authority in public enculturation. Temporarily, the rival position hierarchies have fallen away. The meritocratic discharge of specialized success is pretty much the only one left standing. We can see a correlation between inequality and religious faith (Warr en, 2006). The charge of religious diversity in straight offs times in the United Kingdom has resulted in increased assemble between religious, which has sometimes revealed deep-rooted stereotyping and prepossess, which in turn leads to tension and sometimes conflict between individuals or groups of people in the community. Indeed, religion is an indispensable component in the identity of some of the groups that even up up our society, however, it has also been connected with stereotypes or demoralise preconception, including the assumption of a so-called impinge on of civilizations. Political events and popular discourse have repeatedly been revealed in the media and have negatively linked terrorism and Islam. This has in turn prejudiced social attitudes and led to a Renaissance of religious and racial discrimination in the community and most public places. A latest information on the European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia (EUMC) found that Muslims are often f atalities of inequity, negative stereotyping and of manifestations of prejudice and hatred. These take the form of verbal threats and physical attacks on people and property and racial and mostly religion affiliation profiling (Oliva, 2008). The growing visibleness of religious and belief variety in Europe and especially United Kingdom has been depicted by an increase in unfairness, inequity, and prejudice against religious and ethnic minorities. While a great deal of development has been achieved, biasness on grounds of racial or ethnic origin and religion is mum a problem for many people in our societies, even though this is dicey to accurately measure due to shortsighted of data on the religious write up of the inhabitants of the UK, mainly in regard to minority religions. The English Legal system has created a structure of legal tools, policies, and initiatives for fighting religious and racial unfairness and in turn promoting fairness. Nevertheless, it could be argued t hat the principles of equality and non-discrimination and the respect for the right to freedom of thought, con perception, and religion have not been fully implemented in all Member States (Lansley, 2012). Despite the tremendous fret by the government and the vast launch English legal law, there are still cases of religion inequality and discrimination within individuals and the UK citizens towards either an individual or a specific group or community. People affiliated to religious minorities, especially migrants also, experiences disproportionately lower incomes and higher grade of unemployment, as they face problems accessing housing and in turn living in little environs. They suffer from prejudice and experience expulsion or marginalization in social, political, and economic activity and from unfair treatment in public or social services (Blanden & Machin, 2013). The enactment of the Equality act 2010 in United Kingdom has redefined peoples rights regardless of their re ligion affiliation. The introduction of the law has targeted all people in the country, and in turn offering the right safeguard to people. In addition, the human rights movements have been lively in fight for the peoples rights and in turn bringing along equality among the countries populace. English Legal system has been deemed as one of the all-inclusive legal system and has been a positive aspect in the fight for equality among the United Kingdom citizens. The Equality Act 2010 has been drawn-up to deal with inequality and also prevent prejudice against all sorts of people on the al-Qaida of protected characteristics. It brings together several presented laws and aims to make understanding the law simpler. It also introduces a new single public sector equality duty, which requires public bodies to actively promotion equality. This has enabled the UK government to be able to handle the numerous issues of inequality in the society. In accordance to the question posed whether t he English Legal System is insideng enough to insure Inequalities between Individuals and Groups, the answer is YES. Although there has been numerous handles in the full achievement of equality, the government has been able to implement laws that has been effective in curbing inequality. Moreover, the legal system has developed an effective criminal justice system which has enabled in the fight against inequality (Keister et al, 2012). In conclusion, there are many experiences that remain invisible and ignored within the wider agendas in the fight against inequalities within the English legal system. While the inequalities are widespread and all-encompassing, the legal systems have tried to be all inclusive in solving all forms of inequalities that are experienced within the individuals, and groups in the society. It is clear that there can be an experience of far-reaching inequality, prejudice, favoritism and racism from politicians, the media, and the public. However, numerous recommendations have been made in different chapters for the introduction of ethnic monitoring, for example in health, social work, substance use services and criminal justice. In many of these domains, real equality and human rights law provides the framework for addressing these injustices, but it needs to be proactively and effectively implemented.ReferencesHaskel, J., & Slaugther, M. J. (1999).Trade, technology and U.K. wage inequality. Cambridge,Mass. National potency of Economic Research.Pontusson, J. (2005). contrast and prosperity fond Europe vs. liberal America. Ithaca, NYu.a. Cornell Univ. Press.International roil Office. (2007). Equality at work Tackling the challenges world(prenominal) reportunder the follow up to the ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work. Geneva International Labour Office.Witte, J., & Green, M. C. (2012). religious belief and human rights An introduction. Oxford OxfordUniversity Press.Keister, L. A., McCarthy, J., & Finke , R. (2012). Religion, work, and inequality. Bingley, UKEmerald Group Pub Limited.Chant, S. (2010). The International Handbook of Gender and Poverty. Cheltenham EdwardElgar Pub.Partington, Martin. (2014). Introduction to the English Legal System 2014-2015. Oxford UnivPr.Fafinski, S., & Finch, E. (2008). English legal system. Harlow Longman.Elliott, C. (2012). English legal system. Harlow Pearson.Stephenson, M., & Harrison, J. (2011). Unravelling Equality The feign of the UnitedKingdoms spending Cuts on Women.Political Quarterly,82(4), 645-650. inside10.1111/j.1467-923X.2011.02256.xBoaler, J. (2011). Mathematics and science inequalities in the United Kingdom when elitism,sexism and culture collide.Oxford Review Of Education,37(4), 457-484.Warren, T. (2006). Moving beyond the gender wealth gap On gender, class, ethnicity, andwealth inequalities in the United Kingdom.Feminist Economics,12(1/2), 195-219. doi10.1080/13545700500508502Oliva, J. (2008). Religious Symbols in the Classroom A Controversial Issue in the UnitedKingdom.Brigham Young University Law Review,2008(3), 877-896.Lansley, S. (2012). Inequality, the Crash and the on-going Crisis.Political Quarterly,83(4), 754-761. doi10.1111/j.1467-923X.2012.02357.xBlanden, J., & Machin, S. (2013). Educational Inequality and The Expansion of United Kingdom high Education.Scottish Journal Of Political Economy,60(5), 597-598. doi10.1111/sjpe.12031Source document